Quick one… Let’s say I want to add to my notes field and start a new paragraph. How do I do this?
Well I would need to familiarise myself with be the use of NL() function, which returns a new-line character.
For example, to set up a three line note field:
SET notes = ‘Set’ + NL() + ‘new’ + NL() + ‘line’
Writing to Notes, Including a Return Carriage Character
Results in Notes Field
And so to add to existing notes try the following:
SET notes = notes + NL() + ‘Set’ + NL() + ‘new’ + NL() +’line’
SQL to add to existing Notes field
Often we wish to see the difference between two sets of results displayed in the GeoPlan. This can easily be done in InfoWorks ICM and InfoWorks WS by using a SQL Theme.
In the example below I will be using a 2D mesh but it could be pressure at a node, or flow in a conduit.
Step 1: With a set of results already open Right Click on the second set of simulation results and Open As
Step 2: Select As Alternate Results For Comparison
Note that the header bar shows that both simulations are open in the same GeoPlan view. Also note that for this particular theme the mesh needs to be the same in each simulation.
InfoMaster is a NASSCO Certified Asset Management software for PACP/MACP/LACP data (in addition, the MSCC, EN 13508-2, WSA-05, and New Zealand standards are supported). As such, InfoMaster handles all required fields from a given survey. However, perhaps there are only a few fields that matter to you the most when reviewing or analyzing your CCTV data in InfoMaster. Our interactive data table lets you customize which fields are visible, group fields together, and expand/collapse these groups to simplify your tabular view and enhance the overall viewing capabilities of CCTV data in InfoMaster in tandem with the 3-D internal view.
Simply click the “Edit Fields” button on the Inspections tab…
And you can go from this:
A case study has been written by one of our clients that shows how their modellers have used InfoWorks ICM functionality to represent the interaction of groundwater flow with their integrated InfoWorks ICM model network. The paper was originally presented at CIWEM’s ‘Surface Water Management’ 2014 conference and the British Hydrological Society’s ‘Groundwater Extremes and Surface Water Impacts’ conference. The paper is available on the Innovyze website at the following link:-
The case study describes a novel approach to linking groundwater representation with an integrated sewer model in chalk-dominated region for a study for Southern Water and West Sussex County Council. This formed the basis for simulating design storms with appropriate antecedent conditions.
Our thanks to the case study authors, Adam Cambridge, Senior Consultant, and William Rust, Assistant Hydrologists both from Atkins, UK for sharing this case study with us. If you have a case study or an interesting project which utilises Innovyze software, such as InfoWorks ICM, which you would like to share with others users, please let us know.
Bridges in ICM are dealt with differently to the empirical Arch Bridge (HR Wallingford, 1988) and US BPR Bridge (US Federal Highway Administration, 1978) approaches in Infoworks RS. The approach in ICM has much more in common with the approach used in HECRAS (USACE, 2008) and also described in the Afflux Estimation System (DEFRA/Environment Agency, 2007). The approach is considered to be much more physically meaningful than the empirical approaches derived from limited experimental data. This blogs provides a description of the types of losses that can be represented within Infoworks ICM.
There are a number of different losses which can be represented in ICM bridge links. These are:-
Posted in InfoWorks ICM, InfoWorks RS
Tagged Arch Bridge, Bridges, Contraction, Culvert, Expansion, HECRAS, IWRS, Overtopping, Piers, US BPR Bridge
For customers who use ESRI ArcGIS or ArcEngine version 10.3, these products are now supported by InfoWorks and InfoNet. In order to use ArcGIS or ArcEngine 10.3 you will need to download the latest patch from our website.
The patches required are:
- InfoWorks ICM 5.5.5
- InfoWorks ICM SE 5.5.5
- ICMLive 5.5.5
- InfoNet 15.5.5
- InfoWorks WS 15.5.3
- IWLive 15.5.3
- InfoWorks RS 15.5.3
- InfoWorks CS 15.5.3
- InfoWorks SD 15.5.3
These patches are now available to download from the product updates section of our website for all supported customers.
Note that earlier versions of these products will not recognise ArcGIS 10.3 installations and will generate the following error message: “ArcGIS Licence Error: ArcGIS product not installed”.
Copying SQL syntax directly from an internet browser (Windows Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox etc.) into an SQL dialog box in InfoNet will return an error when the user attempts to test or to run the query. Error messages similar to the following are returned.
Initial NAPI Values in InfoWorks ICM
In the New UK runoff model was calibrated against a variety or urban catchments in the UK. It uses a value of the antecedent wetness conditions (NAPI) which can vary depending on the soil type. The soil type is defined as part of the subcatchment data or as part of the user defined defaults. In the UK, the soil type classification is derived from Maps. There are 5 different soil types although commonly soil type 5 is not used. The soil type effects the value of a constant which is used in the calculation of NAPI. It is common to set an initial value of NAPI which as above can vary depending on the soil type.
A feature of InfoWorks ICM which has been inherited from InfoWorks CS and its predecessor HydroWorks, is that it is only possible to use one value of NAPI with any one rainfall profile. This is a problem in catchments with different soil types where a different value of NAPI is needed for each soil type. This blog describes how it is possible to represent the effect of different soil types on NAPI values within subcatchments.
Initial NAPI Values in InfoWorks ICM
Posted in InfoWorks CS, InfoWorks ICM
Tagged Antecedent Conditions, Catchment Conditions, CRD, Design Rainfall, NAPI, New PR Model, New UK, Observed Rainfall, Rainfall Event, RED, Runoff Model, UCWI, UKWIR, Wallingford
First, establish expected lifetimes of your pipes. This can be achieved by many different means in InfoMaster, some available options are:
- Reliability Analysis – incorporating statistical models (Cox, LEYP, Herz, Weibull, NHPP…)
- Likelihood of Failure – incorporating any data you have available, be it GIS layers or ODBC tables
InfoMaster can perform a variety of different complex statistical deterioration models. Though these models are extremely complex mathematically, all the user needs to do is to specify install dates for pipes (when the pipes ‘began their life’) and specify criteria that defines which pipes have reached the end of their useful life, be it that the pipes have had previous failures, or based on age, material, or any other criteria. The InfoMaster tools will take that data from a sample-size of the network and scale the statistical results to the whole system.
InfoWorks ICM and CS have a number of different ways to model pumps. The two most commonly used are:
- Fixed Pumps (a simplistic method where the discharge is independent of the head on the pump) and
- Rotodynamic Pumps (where a head-discharge curve is used to determine the flow rate of the pump, but there is no speed control of the pump).
Variable Frequency Drive Pumps allows the user to change the speed of a rotodynamic pump by use of an Real Time Control (RTC). These are not to be confused with the Variable Speed Pump – which regulates discharge, and not speed of the pump.
Step 1: Create the model and include the pump as type VFDPump.